NAACP, 12/5/11

On December 5, 2011, the NAACP released a new report revealing direct connections between the trend of increasing, unprecedented African American and Latino voter turnout and an onslaught of restrictive measures across the country designed to stem electoral strength among communities of color.

The report, Defending Democracy: Confronting Modern Barriers to Voting Rights in America, details a plethora of voter suppression initiatives, most of them pushed in states with large African-American populations and where voting turnout has surged. The joint report by the NAACP and the NAACP Legal Defense Fund examines scores of legislative proposals, ballot initiatives and voting laws enacted or proposed since the 2008 election.

Copies of the report will be sent to the federal and state agencies that monitor, administer and enforce voting rights, including the US Department of Justice, the Federal Elections Commission, and the Election Assistance Commission, as well as Secretaries of State and Attorneys General in all 50 states. In addition, the report will be delivered to the appropriate committees of jurisdiction in the House and Senate, and entities within the United Nations.

“It’s been more than a century since we’ve seen such a tidal wave of assaults on the right to vote. Historically, when voting rights are attacked, it’s done to facilitate attacks on other rights. It is no mistake that the groups who are behind this are simultaneously attacking very basic women’s rights, environmental protections, labor rights, and educational access for working people and minorities,” said NAACP President and CEO Benjamin Todd Jealous. “Voting rights attacks are the flip side of buying a democracy. First you buy all the leaders you can, and then you suppress as many votes as possible of the people who might object.”

Successful registration, education and get-out-the-vote campaigns in the last Presidential election cycle helped overturn electoral barriers and generated Black voter turnout at record high numbers across the country. Calling the response “historic in scope and intensity,” the report highlights voting barriers that range from new and enhanced voter identification requirements to provisions that will curtail voter access to registration. Other proposals challenge mass registration drives, limit voting periods and tighten the ability of newly registered voters to cast ballots.

The report maintains that the vote-blocking measures are not only a threat to individual voters, but are also an assault on Latino and African American communities that are enjoying demographic growth and the prospects of majority voting status in many districts.

“This assault — which is comprehensive in its reach and was launched in time to affect the 2012 elections — threatens to undermine the record levels of political participation witnessed during the historic 2008 Presidential Election, by blocking access to people of color, the poor, the elderly and the young,” the report warns.

“These block the vote efforts are a carefully targeted response to the remarkable growth of the minority electorate, and threaten to disproportionally diminish the voting strength of African-Americans and Latinos,” said John Payton, LDF President and Director-Counsel….

keep reading and download the full report at NAACP

Posted by: Webmaster | December 7, 2011

Chris Matthews on the Direction of the 2012 Race

MSNBC Hardball’s Chris Matthews explains why Newt Gingrich and the GOP want to see “the destruction of a positive, hopeful, progressive presidency that proves the American dream is for everyone.”

Play Chris’s Video

Posted by: wcdem2 | December 5, 2011

Jones Leaving Borough Council to Slow Down

By Jake Speicher, West Chester Patch, 12/5/11

Councilman Jim Jones will step down from West Chester Borough Council at the end of December.

You’ve probably met Jim Jones. He’s a familiar presence around town. He wears glasses, taller than you’d expect. The man knows everything.

“I’ve knocked on every door in the borough at least three times,” Jones said. “I don’t think there’s a door I haven’t touched.”

One round of knocking came when he ran for mayor. The next round came when Jones took it upon himself to hand count every parking spot in the borough.

He has a mantra: “No one else will do it. I’ll do it.”

It continues: “Somebody’s got to clean the toilet.”

At the end of December, Jones will step down from borough council, and he plans on slowing down.

After he came to West Chester in the fall of 1992 to work at the university no one saw him for the first two years he was here.

“I was getting the handle on a new job,” said Jones, who besides everything else is also a professor of history at West Chester University. “But then I got that all squared away, and I wanted to see what was up with my neighbors.”

That simple “what’s up” quickly spiraled into committee appointments, board nominations and elected offices. In 14 years, Jones has served his neighborhood association, the library board, the planning commission, the zoning hearing board and most recently borough council.

“I’ve always been someone who gets involved,” Jones said. “There’s a job that needed to be done. I did it, and I learned a lot of stuff.”

Dr. Jones is in the knowledge business, both gaining it and dispensing it. He speaks German and French fluently, and at one time he could also speak two native African languages.

“I’m most proud of my education,” Jones said. “Not just all the stuff I’ve learned, but also the way I learned it.”

Jones’ non-government resume reads like something out of some epic American novel.

He was a migrant worker in Europe while he was trying to hitchhike across the world. He was also a bus driver, a motorcycle mechanic, and he also spent time in the Peace Corps in rural villages in Swaziland in Africa.

“My rule of thumb for any job is that I had to do it for two years,” Jones said. “There were a lot of jobs where that last year was really hard to get through.”

Jones has served on borough council for four years, a kind of capstone to everything else he’s done for the borough.

“My first West Chester experience was I went down to this old-timey Woolworth’s where Iron Hill is now to have coffee with a guy whose apartment I wanted to rent. That’s been the biggest change, the whole revitalization. West Chester’s always been a nice place to live, but now it’s become really desirable.”

[for background see the 4 previous posts, especially "West Chester council taking redistricting resolution to Harrisburg," from Daily Local News]

State Reapportionment Commission Hearing
Testimony by Mayor Carolyn Comitta
Borough of West Chester

November 23, 2011

Good afternoon, honorable members of the Reapportionment Commission. I am Mayor Carolyn Comitta and I bring you greetings from the citizens of the great Borough of West Chester!

I am honored and proud to be the first bi-partisan-elected Mayor of West Chester. As such, I truly represent ALL the voters of the Borough.

Along with me today, are two colleagues who will also testify: permit me to introduce Rich Miller, graduate student at West Chester University, and Bret Binder, resident of East Bradford Township.

In order for you to fully comprehend the significant negative impact of the proposed redistricting on the Borough of West Chester and its neighbors, we believe that it is important for you to hear the complexity of concerns raised from our three perspectives.

Each of us will testify that we believe the proposed split of the Borough of West Chester is in direct violation of the Pennsylvania State Constitution. Mr. Binder will discuss this matter in detail. On display are two boards, prepared by Mr. Binder, that show the existing and the proposed boundaries of the 156th and the 160th, along with the specific text from the State Constitution that we contend is being violated under the proposed redistricting.

West Chester is a 1.8 square mile, compact, historic urban municipality and is the County Seat of Chester County.

The Borough of West Chester has its own charms and challenges that are distinct from its neighboring municipalities. It is a complex community complete with a thriving retail and restaurant district, our county government center, industrial areas, diverse neighborhoods, and a university campus.

In addition, West Chester serves our region as the urban center for social, legal and financial services, culture, higher education and healthcare.

Currently, all of the Borough of West Chester, and all of West Chester University are included in the 156th. The proposal is to split the Borough into two separate House Districts. It would be an anomaly for half of the Borough, the seat of Chester County, to be moved to the 160th, which is essentially a Delaware County District!

If it is not a good idea to split a County, as Senator Costa has stated in his November 18th “Exceptions to the Preliminary Plan,” it is certainly not a good idea to split a county seat, especially one that is an urban center providing a myriad of essential services for the region. For example Judge McEwen, the proposed splitting of the Borough of West Chester would be akin to splitting half of Media and putting it in a predominantly Philadelphia District!

In the spirit of open-mindedness, it is fair to ask, “Hey, couldn’t it be a good thing to have TWO people standing up for you in Harrisburg!”

Good question! And as you can guess, I bring you some good answers!

The West Chester Borough Council frequently works closely with our state representative to address state-regulated issues such as: alcohol (the Borough has 39 liquor licenses!), community development, aging sewer and road repairs, environmental regulations and public safety, such as equipment and training for our highly acclaimed police and volunteer fire departments as well as our state university challenges and opportunities.

Moreover, West Chester Borough is under a Common Pleas Court Order regarding redistricting our Ward system, which has not yet been completed. Keeping the Borough in one House District will eliminate the possibility of conflicts with the State Plan.

Managing two districts within the Borough raises some important practical questions! If two House districts split our town, we can imagine West Chester Borough Council or West Chester University students asking:

“Do we need both Representatives to support this idea?! How do we get them together to discuss this issue?! Where do we meet? Do our two reps agree or are there conflicting Delaware County issues at play etc., etc…?”

There is also the significant confusion and hardship generated for the elderly and for students and minorities (not to mention the rest of us!).

For the past 35 years, our state representative has had their District office in the Borough within walking distance of over 19,000 of their constituents—including the elderly, low income and students, many of whom don’t drive. The proposed split would require half of West Chester’s citizens to drive 40 minutes to Chichester to their representative’s office!

In conclusion, instead of doubling our representation, we believe the proposed redistricting would significantly diminish our voice in Harrisburg and would compound the effort needed to address the Borough’s diverse health, safety and welfare issues.

We ask this final question: “Is it in the best interest of the people, is it constitutional, is it ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY to split the great Borough of West Chester, risking diminishing the leadership and regional services of one of the urban jewels of our state??”

We believe it is absolutely necessary to keep the Borough together—and to keep its State University together—under one House District in order for us to have the best chance of not just surviving but flourishing into the 21st century. Mr. Binder will share an alternative plan that will do just that.

Our future is in your hands. The people of West Chester thank you for your thoughtful consideration. Thank you.

Posted by: Webmaster | November 28, 2011

Neither desirable nor necessary

See the previous post, and please give your opinion to the Legislative Reapportionment Commission, Judge Stephen J. McEwen Jr., Chair.

[As submitted to the Legislative Reapportionment Committee]

I object to the planned redistricting of Pennsylvania Legislative District 156 because splitting three municipalities is neither desirable nor necessary, as outlined in our state constitution.

The district now has one split municipality, East Bradford. The current plan calls for splitting three, East Bradford (while switching all precincts in that township), Westtown and West Chester.

In fact, retaining the integrity of all municipalities serves the goal of proportionality by population, more easily and honestly — reunite East Bradford’s southern precincts with its northern half in the 156th District, leave West Chester in the 156th, and leave Westtown in the 160th District.

That this simpler solution exists not only gives the lie to the idea the current plan is “necessary” but opens the plan to serious legal challenge.

Please reconsider your plan to split these three municipalities. Instead, leave them intact and reunite East Bradford, allowing all to have adequate, cohesive, and honest representation.

Jim Salvas
Secretary, West Chester Borough Democrats

Please give your opinion to the Legislative Reapportionment Commission, Judge Stephen J. McEwen Jr., Chair.

Downtown West Chester, 11/21/11

West Chester, PA — Citizens are encouraged to voice their objection to the proposed redistricting of West Chester Borough into two districts instead of one, according to Mayor Carolyn Comitta and Borough Council President Holly Brown.

The Pennsylvania Legislative Redistricting Commission has proposed to split the Borough of West Chester into two separate House Districts. Currently, House District 156 serves the whole of the Borough of West Chester, an area of 1.8 square miles. But due to redistricting, a process that occurs every ten years to insure that all districts have about an equal number of persons residing within them, the Borough would be served by both the 156th and 160th districts. The new boundaries would set by the wards. Ward 1, 2, 6, and 7 would continue to be in the 156th District and wards 3, 4, and 5 in the 160th District.

“We are asking West Chester citizens to contact the Legislative Reapportionment Commission by November 30 and let them know that West Chester residents object to splitting the Borough into two legislative districts,” said Mayor Carolyn Comitta.

On November 16, the Borough Council passed a resolution to urge the 2011 Legislative Redistricting Commission to maintain the entirety of the Borough of West Chester in a single Chester County legislative district. The resolution indicates that West Chester is a compact, historic urban municipality and is the County Seat of the County of Chester. It also states that West Chester is “an urban community that is unique and does not share the same characteristics as the surrounding suburban communities.” Read the entire resolution: Redistricting Resolution.

Of equal concern, part of West Chester University would be separated from the 156th and put into the 160th, thus dividing the university between two districts. Further, there are no common borders between West Chester and any Delaware County community. Some also feel that the division of West Chester Borough is not absolutely necessary and is therefore in violation of the State Constitution.

Citizens may download a petition here Redistricting Petition and contact members of the Legislative Reapportionment commission with their concerns.

Click on the members below for e-mail contact:

Legislative Reapportionment Commission, Judge Stephen J. McEwen Jr., Chair

Sen. Dominic Pileggi

Sen. Jay Costa

Rep. Mike Turzai

Rep. Frank Dermody

Here also is the message to the same end, telephoned and emailed to the Borough’s distribution list:

Community Blackboard Message: November 26, 2011

Dear West Chester Borough Neighbors:

This is West Chester Mayor Carolyn Comitta. Borough Council and I need your help.  We are asking West Chester citizens to contact the State Reapportionment Commission by November 30, and let them know that West Chester voters object to splitting the Borough into two House districts.

The proposed redistricting would remove half of the Borough and half of West Chester University and place it in a district which is mainly in Delaware County. We firmly believe this split between two districts would significantly diminish and dilute West Chester’s voice at the state level, and that the plan is a direct violation of the State Constitution.

West Chester is a complex, regional urban center. We are the County Seat, of Chester County. West Chester needs a unified voice in Harrisburg to address its unique needs.  We urge you to speak out now. Visit www.downtownwestchester.com for details. Thank you!

Carolyn T. Comitta, Mayor
Holly Brown, Borough Council President
Borough of West Chester

Posted by: wcdem2 | November 26, 2011

WC government: complain to Reapportionment Commission

Community Blackboard Message: November 26, 2011

Dear West Chester Borough Neighbors:

This is West Chester Mayor Carolyn Comitta. Borough Council and I need your help.  We are asking West Chester citizens to contact the State Reapportionment Commission by November 30, and let them know that West Chester voters object to splitting the Borough into two House districts.

The proposed redistricting would remove half of the Borough and half of West Chester University and place it in a district which is mainly in Delaware County. We firmly believe this split between two districts would significantly diminish and dilute West Chester’s voice at the state level, and that the plan is a direct violation of the State Constitution. 

West Chester is a complex, regional urban center. We are the County Seat, of Chester County. West Chester needs a unified voice in Harrisburg to address its unique needs.  We urge you to speak out now. Visit www.downtownwestchester.com for details. Thank you!

Carolyn T. Comitta, Mayor
Holly Brown, Borough Council President
Borough of West Chester

from Chester County Democratic Committee, 11/25/11:

In order to cut down on political shenanigans, the PA state constitution specifies (Article II, Section 16):

“…Unless absolutely necessary no county, city, incorporated town, borough, township or ward shall be divided in forming either a
senatorial or representative district.”

The day before Thanksgiving, representatives of West Chester, East Bradford, and West Chester University presented the state’s Legislative Redistricting Commission with a proposal for redistricting districts 156, 158, 160, and 168 that adheres more closely to the constitutional mandate than the plan recently put forward by Harrisburg.

The Harrisburg plan, manifestly designed to split up municipalities that could threaten the majority party’s control, notably relegated 3/7 of the Chester County seat to a district situated mainly in Delaware County.

In the 156th, 158th, 160th, and 168th, the Harrisburg plan (see all the proposed districts courtesy of PoliticsPA) splits 7 municipalities in all: East Bradford, West Chester, Westtown, Upper Chichester, Aston, Newtown, and Upper Providence.

The “citizens’ plan”–while respecting as well or better the further desiderata of contiguity, compactness, and approximately equal populations–splits only 5 municipalities: East Bradford, Thornbury Delco, Aston, Newtown, and Upper Providence.

Therefore–and this will be significant if an appeal goes to the PA Supreme Court–it is evident that the politically-motivated splitting of 7 municipalities is not “absolutely necessary.”…

keep reading at Chester County Democratic Committee


 

West Chester council taking redistricting resolution to Harrisburg
By JEREMY GERRARD, 11/17/11

WEST CHESTER — Borough Council voted unanimously Wednesday evening to pass a resolution urging the 2011 Legislative Reapportionment Commission to maintain the entirety of the borough in a single Chester County legislative district.

Council members will be traveling to Harrisburg on Friday to speak to the General Assembly, requesting that they keep the borough in one district.

Redistricting plans for the state included a proposal to break apart the borough, putting wards 3, 4 and 5 into the 160th District and Wards 1, 2, 6 and 7 in the 156th District.

The proposed 160th District would consist of parts of Delaware County including the townships of Bethel, Chadds Ford, Concord and Upper Chichester, as well as East Bradford and Birmingham townships in Chester County.

Council said it is opposed to this “gerrymandering” by the General Assembly and intends to fight it in Harrisburg.

The resolution reads as follows:

“Whereas, the Pennsylvania Legislative Redistricting Commission has proposed to split the Borough of West Chester into two separate House Districts, and

Whereas, West Chester is a 1.8-square-mile, compact, historic urban municipality and is the County Seat of the County of Chester, and

Whereas, our urban community is unique and does not share the same characteristics as the surrounding suburban communities, and

Whereas it is proposed that half of our Borough, the County seat of Chester County, will be included in a district most of which is in Delaware County even though there are no common borders between West Chester and any Delaware County community, and

Whereas, the proposed redistricting would remove West Chester University and place it in a district most of which is in Delaware County even though there are no common borders between West Chester and any Delaware County Community, and

Whereas, the division of West Chester Borough is not necessary for the creation of a new District and is therefore in violation of the State Constitution.

Now therefore be it resolved, that the Borough Council of West Chester respectfully requests and urges the 2011 Legislative Redistricting Commission to maintain the entirety of the Borough of West Chester in a single Chester County legislative district.”

Petitions are currently being passed around the borough for residents’ signatures. Petition forms can be obtained at borough hall or by contacting the mayor’s office.

Posted by: Webmaster | November 8, 2011

2011 General Election Candidates Page

If Candidate Names are red, click them to reach the candidates’ campaign websites.

WEST CHESTER BOROUGH COUNCIL
Ward 2
Cassandra L. Jones
Cassandra L. Jones, Borough Council Member
Ward 4
Jordan C. Norley
Jordan C. Norley
Ward 6
Stephen A. Shinn
Stephen A. Shinn

CHESTER COUNTY COMMISSIONER (Vote for TWO)
Kathleen M. Cozzone
Commissioner Kathi Cozzone

KATHI COZZONE has represented her constituents tirelessly since elected Commissioner in 2007. In early 2011, she was elected the first Democrat to serve as Vice Chair of the County Commissioners.

Susan L. Bayne
Susan L. Bayne, Borough Council Member

SUSAN BAYNE is a long-time resident of Chester County. She has served on the West Chester Borough Council for the past eight years, including two years as Council President. Susan works full time for Siemens Medical Solutions USA as a buyer in the Health Services Procurement department.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS (Vote for TWO)
Fredda Lewis MaddoxFacebook
Fredda Maddox

FREDDA LEWIS MADDOX is from Birmingham Township and has a wide range of experience making her ideally suited for the bench. Fredda has been a PA State Trooper, served in the PA Attorney General’s office and spent over ten years with the Philadelphia Public Defender’s Office. She has a law degree from Widener University, a Master’s degree in Criminal Justice from West Chester University, and a Bachelor’s degree from Edinboro University.

Thomas H. PurlResumé
Tom Purl

TOM PURL is from Downing- town. After retiring from a distin- guished military career, Tom finished Widener law school in 27 months (just over two years). Tom has extensive trial experience in various areas of law, including almost ten years with the Philadelphia Defender’s Office, juvenile division. Tom will bring his leadership and legal experience to serving on the bench.

DISTRICT ATTORNEY
Samuel C. Stretton
Samuel C. Stretton

 

SAM STRETTON has been a trial attorney for over 35 years, handling cases in Philadelphia, Chester County and throughout Pennsylvania. Sam has tried over 300 homicide cases and many more appeals. He is currently handling the appeal of the Barnes Foundation move. Sam has been listed as a Pennsylvania Super Lawyer every year since 2005. Sam has degrees from Penn State University and the Dickinson College of Law.

SHERIFF
Alexander Patrick Caton
Alexander Patrick Caton

 

ALEX CATON is a graduate of Virginia Tech and has a Master’s Degree in Criminal Justice. Alex is resides in West Bradford Township and is working on his PhD.

RECORDER OF DEEDS
Russell W. Phifer • Facebook
Russell W. Phifer

 

RUSS PHIFER is from London Grove Township and runs his own environmental health and safety consulting business. He has lived in Chester County his whole life and has extensive real estate experience in many Pennsylvania counties. Russ has over 30 years of serving the people and businesses of Chester County. He has assessed and performed title searches on hundreds of properties in Chester County.

WEST CHESTER AREA SCHOOL BOARD
A. Wayne Burton
West Chester VOTE (Voters Open To Education)FacebookClick to Download a Specimen Ballot PDF to take to your poll
West Chester VOTE Write-In Candidates

West Chester VOTE Write-In Candidates

REGISTER OF WILLS
Daniel E. Tyman
Daniel E. Tyman

 

DANIEL TYMAN is a lifelong resident of Chester County from Pocopson Township. Daniel received his Bachelor of Arts, magna cum laude, in Political Science from West Chester University and his Juris Doctor from the Temple University Beasley School of Law where he also served as President of the Student Bar Association. Daniel is also a licensed Pennsylvania attorney. He is committed to working full-time and bringing his experience, both legal and managerial, to the Register of Wills office and providing Chester County residents with the best and most cost-efficient services possible.

PA SUPERIOR COURT
David N. Wecht • Facebook
David N. Wecht

 

DAVID WECHT was a Judge of the Court of Common Pleas for Allegheny County since 2003. He has an undergraduate and law degree from Yale University.

PA COMMONWEALTH COURT
Kathryn Boockvar • Facebook
Kathryn Boockvar

 

KATHRYN BOOCKVAR is an attorney from Bucks County. She has devoted her practice for the past 17 years to working for people and non-profit organizations. The Pennsylvania Bar Association gave her a rating of “Recommended” and she was named a legal Rising Star three times. She’s been backed by a wide variety of organizations and unions.

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

Categories

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.